<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Winners in Copenhagen Are:</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dangerouscreation.com/2009/12/the-winners-in-copenhagen-are/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dangerouscreation.com/2009/12/the-winners-in-copenhagen-are/</link>
	<description>&#34;Argue not with fools, frauds, fops, and fanatics. Seek instead better companions.&#34;                          ----- &#34;Show    me a  millionaire and I will show you a man who has never thought about the meaning of  his life.&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:21:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Therese</title>
		<link>http://www.dangerouscreation.com/2009/12/the-winners-in-copenhagen-are/comment-page-1/#comment-14519</link>
		<dc:creator>Therese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangerouscreation.com/?p=3236#comment-14519</guid>
		<description>www.jewishracism.blogspot.com is the direct route to Bjerknes&#039;s report on the hateful enslaving directions in which both the branches of Australia&#039;s government has gone, to the detriment of its people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com</a> is the direct route to Bjerknes&#8217;s report on the hateful enslaving directions in which both the branches of Australia&#8217;s government has gone, to the detriment of its people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnLJ</title>
		<link>http://www.dangerouscreation.com/2009/12/the-winners-in-copenhagen-are/comment-page-1/#comment-14511</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnLJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangerouscreation.com/?p=3236#comment-14511</guid>
		<description>thanks Grace

when you write:
&quot; human impact affects the weather. If you turn a place into a desert,&quot;
 seems  you have grasped the graveness of the impact made by mankind to the earth, (to the painfully. )

I found a picture, in my encyclopedia, of a BOABAB tree, a very huge/thick tree, from Kenya , could be this kind of trees ? -I think.

Here is a link to another evidence of the stupidiy perpetrated by homo (not that) sapient.

The deforestation in Brazil since 1970 amount to amazing 750.000km2 !!!  (to compare with, Turkey =780.000km2) in just 39 years!!   

My heart is bleeding when I realize the magnitude mankind destruction on the earth.

excerpt:
&quot;&quot;Between May 2000 and August 2006, Brazil lost nearly 150,000 square kilometers of forest—an area larger than Greece—and since 1970, over 600,000 square kilometers (232,000 square miles) of Amazon rainforest have been destroyed. Why is Brazil losing so much forest? What can be done to slow deforestation? 
read more    -------
http://www.mongabay.com/brazil.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks Grace</p>
<p>when you write:<br />
&#8221; human impact affects the weather. If you turn a place into a desert,&#8221;<br />
 seems  you have grasped the graveness of the impact made by mankind to the earth, (to the painfully. )</p>
<p>I found a picture, in my encyclopedia, of a BOABAB tree, a very huge/thick tree, from Kenya , could be this kind of trees ? -I think.</p>
<p>Here is a link to another evidence of the stupidiy perpetrated by homo (not that) sapient.</p>
<p>The deforestation in Brazil since 1970 amount to amazing 750.000km2 !!!  (to compare with, Turkey =780.000km2) in just 39 years!!   </p>
<p>My heart is bleeding when I realize the magnitude mankind destruction on the earth.</p>
<p>excerpt:<br />
&#8220;&#8221;Between May 2000 and August 2006, Brazil lost nearly 150,000 square kilometers of forest—an area larger than Greece—and since 1970, over 600,000 square kilometers (232,000 square miles) of Amazon rainforest have been destroyed. Why is Brazil losing so much forest? What can be done to slow deforestation?<br />
read more    &#8212;&#8212;-<br />
<a href="http://www.mongabay.com/brazil.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mongabay.com/brazil.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grace</title>
		<link>http://www.dangerouscreation.com/2009/12/the-winners-in-copenhagen-are/comment-page-1/#comment-14504</link>
		<dc:creator>Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangerouscreation.com/?p=3236#comment-14504</guid>
		<description>John, I realize how important it is to be accurate when sharing information.  When I think forest I think thick trees.  There were many trees in the Sahara.  However one site describes it this way: 

http://www.nowpublic.com/environment/decertification-part-ii-history-sahara-desert-attempt-stop-decertification-6

&quot;the Sahara Desert was once a real paradise of lush vegetation, diverse Animals and Insects as well as the greatest Genetic Variety of Humanoids!&quot;

There was an experiment done by scientists to see if they could heal the Sahara and bring back green life:

&quot;The Idea was to find out if Nature could heal it self if we took the Human factor out as well as grassing from Domestic as well as wild animals!

After 4 Years, a first rainfall came and the area was lush Green again, this vegetation did die off after the draught set in again, yet the trees and bushes remained even though they seemed dead at first glance! As the second rain came 8 Years later, all was green again, this time however one could see the trees and bushes growing and establishing them self again! The draught returned yet the trees and bushes even though dormant survived until the next rain!

The conclusion was that the Sahara could recover by it self if we took the Mammals out of the area for about two centuries!

..However, &quot; It was a great Idea, yet failed totally due to two mistakes that where made!

One being the introduction of foreign species to the area that ended up killing local vegetation adapted to the Sahel (Sahara) zone, such has the introduction of Eucalyptus Trees from Australia!

Second, was the Human factoring again, the locals started cutting the trees and use them as firewood as they always did! The habits had not changed and now that there was an abundance of trees, again the use of firewood to keep warm in the cold desert nights was more practiced once again due to the available planted wood!

Well needless to say, not much is left of that green wall today!

Even though the rain falls over the Sahel zone have steadily been increasing over the past 4 decades the expansion of the Sahara desert has been faster then ever, not due to lack of rain as some may believe, yet due to an increase in the Human population and of domestic animals overgrazing the area to the point that no tree nor any bush can reestablish it self any longer!&quot;

As Kemosabi was saying,.. something about the human population.  Yikes!  That is mathematically speaking, exponential - and surely will bring the terrible demise of many.

Thnking in this new way, realizing that almost all of the great deserts on our planet are man-made.. Puts these global warming deniers into the -STUPID- category.  Yes, human impact affects the weather.  If you turn a place into a desert, the whole eco-system of our planet changes.   Hello World &quot;Leaders!&quot;  D&#039;oh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, I realize how important it is to be accurate when sharing information.  When I think forest I think thick trees.  There were many trees in the Sahara.  However one site describes it this way: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nowpublic.com/environment/decertification-part-ii-history-sahara-desert-attempt-stop-decertification-6" rel="nofollow">http://www.nowpublic.com/environment/decertification-part-ii-history-sahara-desert-attempt-stop-decertification-6</a></p>
<p>&#8220;the Sahara Desert was once a real paradise of lush vegetation, diverse Animals and Insects as well as the greatest Genetic Variety of Humanoids!&#8221;</p>
<p>There was an experiment done by scientists to see if they could heal the Sahara and bring back green life:</p>
<p>&#8220;The Idea was to find out if Nature could heal it self if we took the Human factor out as well as grassing from Domestic as well as wild animals!</p>
<p>After 4 Years, a first rainfall came and the area was lush Green again, this vegetation did die off after the draught set in again, yet the trees and bushes remained even though they seemed dead at first glance! As the second rain came 8 Years later, all was green again, this time however one could see the trees and bushes growing and establishing them self again! The draught returned yet the trees and bushes even though dormant survived until the next rain!</p>
<p>The conclusion was that the Sahara could recover by it self if we took the Mammals out of the area for about two centuries!</p>
<p>..However, &#8221; It was a great Idea, yet failed totally due to two mistakes that where made!</p>
<p>One being the introduction of foreign species to the area that ended up killing local vegetation adapted to the Sahel (Sahara) zone, such has the introduction of Eucalyptus Trees from Australia!</p>
<p>Second, was the Human factoring again, the locals started cutting the trees and use them as firewood as they always did! The habits had not changed and now that there was an abundance of trees, again the use of firewood to keep warm in the cold desert nights was more practiced once again due to the available planted wood!</p>
<p>Well needless to say, not much is left of that green wall today!</p>
<p>Even though the rain falls over the Sahel zone have steadily been increasing over the past 4 decades the expansion of the Sahara desert has been faster then ever, not due to lack of rain as some may believe, yet due to an increase in the Human population and of domestic animals overgrazing the area to the point that no tree nor any bush can reestablish it self any longer!&#8221;</p>
<p>As Kemosabi was saying,.. something about the human population.  Yikes!  That is mathematically speaking, exponential &#8211; and surely will bring the terrible demise of many.</p>
<p>Thnking in this new way, realizing that almost all of the great deserts on our planet are man-made.. Puts these global warming deniers into the -STUPID- category.  Yes, human impact affects the weather.  If you turn a place into a desert, the whole eco-system of our planet changes.   Hello World &#8220;Leaders!&#8221;  D&#8217;oh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnLJ</title>
		<link>http://www.dangerouscreation.com/2009/12/the-winners-in-copenhagen-are/comment-page-1/#comment-14499</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnLJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangerouscreation.com/?p=3236#comment-14499</guid>
		<description>I am surprised to learn that , Grace
that:
&quot;The great Sahara was once a forest&quot;.

It gives me a great/huge idea!   of the year...

Excuse me, for my humbleness, but not all used words here, is mine, &#039;cause now&amp;then I have to  turn to the dictionary, for help, to found the right words: e.g. &quot;a scheme that bears the hallmark of genious &quot; or  &quot;kill two birds with one stone&quot;,  to a solution of Palestine/Israel /DESERT issues.

For sixty+ years we have had,  [and undoubtedly will FOREVER HAVE ] a UNsolved problem  in the middle east,  IF NOT some kind of new way of thinking is put on the table.

What about:
Aren&#039;t we used to hear the great stories about  how,  especially the Jews/zionists are able to convert  desert into a profitable fertile soil for agriculture. ?

It may seems obvious. Give the desert to the zionist/jews and LEAVE Palestine for Palestinians.!!!

Will not all be happy then ? - even the earth itself..
with a great 
MERRY CHRISMAS.
----------------------------
Therese
There&#039;s only a transportation problem.

Maybe we could/should direct mother earth into a different trajection, to go explore on adventures of &#039;new&#039; dimensions.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised to learn that , Grace<br />
that:<br />
&#8220;The great Sahara was once a forest&#8221;.</p>
<p>It gives me a great/huge idea!   of the year&#8230;</p>
<p>Excuse me, for my humbleness, but not all used words here, is mine, &#8217;cause now&amp;then I have to  turn to the dictionary, for help, to found the right words: e.g. &#8220;a scheme that bears the hallmark of genious &#8221; or  &#8220;kill two birds with one stone&#8221;,  to a solution of Palestine/Israel /DESERT issues.</p>
<p>For sixty+ years we have had,  [and undoubtedly will FOREVER HAVE ] a UNsolved problem  in the middle east,  IF NOT some kind of new way of thinking is put on the table.</p>
<p>What about:<br />
Aren&#8217;t we used to hear the great stories about  how,  especially the Jews/zionists are able to convert  desert into a profitable fertile soil for agriculture. ?</p>
<p>It may seems obvious. Give the desert to the zionist/jews and LEAVE Palestine for Palestinians.!!!</p>
<p>Will not all be happy then ? &#8211; even the earth itself..<br />
with a great<br />
MERRY CHRISMAS.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Therese<br />
There&#8217;s only a transportation problem.</p>
<p>Maybe we could/should direct mother earth into a different trajection, to go explore on adventures of &#8216;new&#8217; dimensions.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Therese</title>
		<link>http://www.dangerouscreation.com/2009/12/the-winners-in-copenhagen-are/comment-page-1/#comment-14498</link>
		<dc:creator>Therese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangerouscreation.com/?p=3236#comment-14498</guid>
		<description>I say if women give birth to more children than the dwellers on earth want, let these be allowed to colonize/populate other planets, as in an adventure new world plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say if women give birth to more children than the dwellers on earth want, let these be allowed to colonize/populate other planets, as in an adventure new world plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Therese</title>
		<link>http://www.dangerouscreation.com/2009/12/the-winners-in-copenhagen-are/comment-page-1/#comment-14497</link>
		<dc:creator>Therese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangerouscreation.com/?p=3236#comment-14497</guid>
		<description>Please, may that not happen.  Christopher Jon Bjerknes at www.jewishracism.com, writes that  as of Nov., 2009, by law, Australia has created a racist and authoritarian government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, may that not happen.  Christopher Jon Bjerknes at <a href="http://www.jewishracism.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.jewishracism.com</a>, writes that  as of Nov., 2009, by law, Australia has created a racist and authoritarian government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David G</title>
		<link>http://www.dangerouscreation.com/2009/12/the-winners-in-copenhagen-are/comment-page-1/#comment-14482</link>
		<dc:creator>David G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangerouscreation.com/?p=3236#comment-14482</guid>
		<description>Kemosobi, it is common knowledge that, in our world, those who make the most money pay the least tax.

If we had a carbon tax, those who pollute the most, because of their political clout, would pay the least and the little people like you and me would pay the most. It&#039;s the reality of the world we live in!

Population or more correctly over-population is a real issue for our world. We can&#039;t continue as we are. I&#039;ll apply my mind to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kemosobi, it is common knowledge that, in our world, those who make the most money pay the least tax.</p>
<p>If we had a carbon tax, those who pollute the most, because of their political clout, would pay the least and the little people like you and me would pay the most. It&#8217;s the reality of the world we live in!</p>
<p>Population or more correctly over-population is a real issue for our world. We can&#8217;t continue as we are. I&#8217;ll apply my mind to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kemosobi</title>
		<link>http://www.dangerouscreation.com/2009/12/the-winners-in-copenhagen-are/comment-page-1/#comment-14481</link>
		<dc:creator>Kemosobi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangerouscreation.com/?p=3236#comment-14481</guid>
		<description>David, we do have a nuclear Reactor for energy production and scientific research at Lukas Heights.  The last photo looks more like a huge wildfire taken from a distance, rather than a polluted city in china.  I feel pretty pissed off at all and any politicians on this issue, all want to protect jobs, some want to compensate big polluters and give them free credits to do so.  The CPRS is a capitalist mechanism for making money not cleaning up pollution.  As it would have been a capitilist venture with trade of carbon credits etc etc, which opens the whole cprs to the same standards as the Global Financial Crisis.  What we need is a Carbon tax and tighter regulations.  A tax- everybody pays the more you pollute the more you pay, regulations set for polluters offers them no way out, no subsidies only the fact that they have to change or be fined, so they don&#039;t win and it forces them to change.  There is one issue not discussed and maybe one for your next article &#039;Human POPULATION&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, we do have a nuclear Reactor for energy production and scientific research at Lukas Heights.  The last photo looks more like a huge wildfire taken from a distance, rather than a polluted city in china.  I feel pretty pissed off at all and any politicians on this issue, all want to protect jobs, some want to compensate big polluters and give them free credits to do so.  The CPRS is a capitalist mechanism for making money not cleaning up pollution.  As it would have been a capitilist venture with trade of carbon credits etc etc, which opens the whole cprs to the same standards as the Global Financial Crisis.  What we need is a Carbon tax and tighter regulations.  A tax- everybody pays the more you pollute the more you pay, regulations set for polluters offers them no way out, no subsidies only the fact that they have to change or be fined, so they don&#8217;t win and it forces them to change.  There is one issue not discussed and maybe one for your next article &#8216;Human POPULATION&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David G</title>
		<link>http://www.dangerouscreation.com/2009/12/the-winners-in-copenhagen-are/comment-page-1/#comment-14479</link>
		<dc:creator>David G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangerouscreation.com/?p=3236#comment-14479</guid>
		<description>They&#039;ll have to drag me off to jail before I&#039;ll close down this blog, Therese!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ll have to drag me off to jail before I&#8217;ll close down this blog, Therese!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Therese</title>
		<link>http://www.dangerouscreation.com/2009/12/the-winners-in-copenhagen-are/comment-page-1/#comment-14476</link>
		<dc:creator>Therese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangerouscreation.com/?p=3236#comment-14476</guid>
		<description>No wonder that the Rothschilds want Australia to filter the internet, so that the likes of dear David G. cannot disturb the slumber of the sheeple.  Sure hope his government doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No wonder that the Rothschilds want Australia to filter the internet, so that the likes of dear David G. cannot disturb the slumber of the sheeple.  Sure hope his government doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

